Current:Home > reviewsJudge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation -ProfitEdge
Judge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation
View
Date:2025-04-21 19:55:26
A federal judge on Thursday struck down a Biden administration policy that aimed to ease a path to citizenship for some undocumented immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens.
The program, lauded as one of the biggest presidential actions to help immigrant families in years, allowed undocumented spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens to apply for a green card without first having to leave the country.
The temporary relief from deportation brought a brief sense of security to some 500,000 immigrants estimated to benefit from the program before Texas-based U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker put it on hold in August, days after applicants filed their paperwork.
Barker ruled Thursday that the Biden administration had overstepped its authority by implementing the program and had stretched the legal interpretation of relevant immigration law “past its breaking point.”
The short-lived Biden administration initiative known as “Keeping Families Together” would have been unlikely to remain in place after Donald Trump took office in January. But its early termination creates greater uncertainty for immigrant families as many are bracing for Trump’s return to the White House.
Trump’s election victory this week sets the stage for a swift crackdown on undocumented individuals after the Republican ran on promises of “mass deportation.” The president-elect energized his supporters on the campaign trail with a litany anti-immigrant statements, including that immigrants were “poisoning the blood” of the nation.
During his first term, Trump appointed Barker as a judge in Tyler, Texas, which lies in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a favored venue for advocates pushing conservative arguments.
Barker had placed the immigration initiative on hold after Texas and 15 other states, led by their Republican attorneys general, filed a legal challenge accusing the executive branch of bypassing Congress to help immigrant families for “blatant political purposes.”
Republicans argued the initiative created costs for their states and could draw more migrants to the U.S.
The policy would have applied to people who have been living continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, do not pose a security threat and have utilized the existing legal authority known as “parole in place” that offers deportation protections.
Those married to a citizen by June 17, the day before the program was announced, could pay a $580 application fee and fill out a lengthy application explaining why they deserve humanitarian parole. If approved, applicants would have three years to seek permanent residency and obtain work authorization.
It was not immediately clear Thursday whether anyone had received approval under the program, which only accepted applications for about a week before the federal judge placed it on hold.
Noncitizen spouses are already eligible for legal status but often have to apply from their home countries. The process typically includes a years-long wait outside of the U.S., which can separate family members with different immigration statuses.
veryGood! (974)
Related
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- Ohio River May Lose Its Regional Water Quality Standards, Vote Suggests
- Go Under the Sea With These Secrets About the Original The Little Mermaid
- Be a Part of Halle Bailey and Boyfriend DDG's World With This PDA Video
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Bella Thorne Is Engaged to Producer Mark Emms
- CBS News' David Pogue defends OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush after Titan tragedy: Nobody thought anything at the time
- Brittany Cartwright Reacts to Critical Comments About Her Appearance in Mirror Selfie
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Wyoming's ban on abortion pills blocked days before law takes effect
Ranking
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- VA hospitals are outperforming private hospitals, latest Medicare survey shows
- Taylor Swift and Ice Spice's Karma Remix Is Here and It's Sweet Like Honey
- Abortion access could continue to change in year 2 after the overturn of Roe v. Wade
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- India's population passes 1.4 billion — and that's not a bad thing
- It's never too late to explore your gender identity. Here's how to start
- Coastal biomedical labs are bleeding more horseshoe crabs with little accountability
Recommendation
$73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
Millionaire says OceanGate CEO offered him discount tickets on sub to Titanic, claimed it was safer than scuba diving
As ‘Tipping Point’ Nears for Cheap Solar, Doors Open to Low-Income Families
Wayfair's Memorial Day Sale 2023 Has 82% Off Dyson, Blackstone & More Incredible Deals for Under $100
Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
Titan sub implosion highlights extreme tourism boom, but adventure can bring peril
Washington State Voters Reject Nation’s First Carbon Tax
America Now Has 27.2 Gigawatts of Solar Energy: What Does That Mean?